Bring-Indian-Money-Back-From-Swiss-BankOn fifth of June 2011, Indian government and the Delhi Police created the history by bringing back the memories of Jalian Wala Bagh at Ramleela Maidan. No sane person can support the violent police actions that were taken against the peaceful protesters who gathered there at the call of Baba Ramdev. It was the replay of India Against Corruption Show that was initially started by Anna Hajare at Jantar Mantar. However, Baba Ramdev had different issues to look after. In place of demanding a strong Jan LokPal Bill he raised his voice against the Black Money that had been transferred in foreign banks and specially Swiss Banks. He claimed that around four lakh crore INR has been stashed in Swiss Banks and it is all Black Money. He demanded that all this money should be announced as National Property and government should do hard to bring all this money fast back to India.

For common citizens of India, who are facing inflation and price rise and are unable to cope up with the ever increasing prices of food articles and other basic commodities, it seemed like a good cause that will bring prosperity to India and hence will reduce their problems of poverty. While it is true that Baba Ramdev had good intentions behind his Satyagrah, but it is also important to analyze whether his demands will prove to be really beneficial if the Indian money is brought back from Swiss Banks?

Later on, the Supreme Court of India also issued notices against government and created a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to vigil the ongoing proceedings for bringing the Indian money back from Swiss Banks. Obviously, there are no genuine and intelligent economists in the Supreme Court, they are all lawyers and judges who know nothing about economics and how it works. Here I will provide a rational view point about bringing back Indian Money from Swiss Banks and the negative and positive effects of this.

What is Black Money?

Black money is that undisclosed money which has been stored by Indians either in foreign banks or in India itself but haven’t paid any tax on that money. AS a matter of fact, taxation is nothing but legalized robbery and exploitation of honest hard working people that is performed by the government officials under the immoral and unethical code of conduct. However, let us forget about the immorality of Taxes at present.

It is believed that most of the Black Money from India has been stored in Swiss Banks and according to the reports, this is true. Indian people believe that Indian Government willfully try not to bring back Indian black money from the banks of Switzerland and that is why they wholeheartedly supported Baba Ramdev and his demands. However, Switzerland is a different country which is far more close to the concept of individual liberty. Indians cannot understand why it is difficult or in fact, impossible to bring the black money back from Swiss banks because they have never tried to understand the concept of Limited Government. Switzerland government is a limited government and hence it does not hold any such power over the people of Switzerland and their businesses which include the Swiss Banks through which it may force them to pay the money stored by Indians to the Indian government.

It is very hard for Indians to understand this fact that even if the government of Switzerland supports Indian government and want to let Indian government have the black money, it cannot force Swiss Banks to do so. Often Indians and in fact most of the Asians fail to understand the importance of Individual liberty and its meaning. Similar thing happened during Danish Cartoon Protest when the Danish Prime Minister refused to take actions against the newspaper and the cartoonist in defense of Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Speech. People in Muslim countries were unable to understand it. Rather they felt that the Danish PM supported that newspaper and cartoonist.

In similar fashion, Indians believe that the government of Switzerland actually support the Swiss Banks and doesn’t want Indian government to get back all the black money.

How to recover the black money from Swiss Banks?

Before trying to get back the money that was allegedly stolen from India, it would be necessary to know whether that money is in Dollars or Swiss France, or is it still in Indian Currency INR.

Let us assume that the money is in USD or Swiss currency (CHF). The money was first converted and then was stored in Swiss Banks. The Swiss Banks might have invested that money in some business projects. In any case, that money is of no use for Indians. The very important thing that needs to be understood is Currency is not Wealth. We do not eat rupees. We use INR as a means to share, distribute sand transfer wealth. When money or currency is taken out of an economy, the purchasing power or value of that currency increases. That is, inflation or price rise decreases. Let us try to understand it in a simpler manner.

Assume a village of 50 people where the total amount of currency is Rs100 and the total production of wheat is 100 kilos for a day. Obviously in this village, everybody will be able to buy 1 kilogram of wheat every day. While some people will be able to save some money even after buying the required one kilogram of wheat every day, some other will fail to save any money as all will be spend in buying wheat and eating food. Now those people, who have saved some money, meet and agree to collect their money and invest it in some other village or to steal it from the economy of their own village by depositing it in Swiss Banks. What will happen? Let’s say those group of people saved and deposited Rs50 in Swiss Banks. So now, the total currency in that village is Rs50. However, the weight of available wheat is still 100 kilogram per day and total number of people is still 50. The next day, the shopkeepers will sell the wheat at the same price of Rs1 per kilogram, but they will find that many people were unable to buy the wheat because the total currency is only Rs50 while total wheat is 100 Kilogram. They will fail to sell remaining 50 kilogram and will have to store it. Wheat can’t be stored for long and it will start spoiling within 2-3 days especially because of the shortage of proper storage as it is not required. As a result in order to avoid loss of wheat, the shopkeepers will reduce the price of wheat and will start selling it at a Half a Rupee per kilogram. So you see, because of the stolen money from that village’s economy, the price of wheat will decrease to half.

However, in case of Indian economy, which is already under foreign debt, if the Indian Money which is in form of USD or CHF is brought back from Swiss Banks, this money can be used to pay back the foreign debt. But will that do any good for Indians? It hardly would do any good because Indian government always works in fiscal deficit and within a few years, it will again rebuild the debt.

Now let us consider the other case in which the black money deposited in Swiss Banks is still in Indian currency. This money cannot be used to pay the foreign debt back hence; it cannot be used in any manner. However, it will certainly create havoc in India. Let us again take the case of that small village of 50 people and total currency of Rs100 where some people stole half of the currency. We saw that because of their theft of currency (not wealth), the price of wheat got reduced to half. Now total currency is Rs50, total wheat is 100 kilos and the price is 50 Paise per kilo. This is a good situation for those poor people who were unable to buy enough wheat at a price of Rs 1 per kilo because they had less money. Suddenly the government of that village decides to bring the black money back in its economy. The very next day, there are Rs100 in the village and 100 kilogram of wheat. Soon the rich people will start offering higher price to get more wheat and shopkeepers will also have to raise the price of wheat to Rs1 kilogram and a result the poor people again will suffer loss of wheat because they will not be able to buy it at increased price.

Whenever government increases the currency either by printing money or by any other means, the inflation and price rise takes place. It is a general and genuine phenomenon. Government can control inflation or price rise by reducing the currency. The Swiss Banks already have reduced the actual amount of currency that was printed by government and by doing so; Swiss Banks actually have helped Indian poor people as it has reduced the rate of inflation which at present is 10%. If somehow the Indian money is brought back from the Swiss banks, it will again increase the price of wheat and other commodities and the real sufferers will be the poor and middle class Indians who are already suffering because of inflation.

Furthermore, what is the need to bring that money back? If money can make India rich then the government and RBI can print a lot of currency in a single day. But that will not make India rich, it will make price go sky high and poor will die of hunger. We must understand that we don’t eat rupees, we eat wheat. So there is no loss is some people have deposited rupees in Swiss Banks. However, if some people are wasting or stealing our wheat, then they are the real culprit. Everybody knows that Indian government wastes a lot of wheat by not providing proper storage and they steal a lot of wheat by forcing export of wheat. The government is real culprit of Indian poverty and not the Swiss Banks or those people who have stored Indian money in Swiss Banks.

Money is not Wealth

Comments


  • Pingback: Why it was so Difficult for BS Yedurappa to Leave CM Office | Rational Libertarian Corner Blog

  • Pingback: Rahul Gandhi, Digvijay Singh and Land Acquisition | Rational Libertarian Corner Blog

  • Pingback: Homosexuals Legal or Illegal | Rational Libertarian Corner

  • Pingback: Revolution Against Political Corruption | Rational Libertarian Corner

  • Pingback: Few Good Things About India Against Corruption | Rational Libertarian Corner

  • Pingback: Can Anna Hajare Remove Corruption? | Rational Libertarian Corner

  • Pingback: Why Not to Vote In Elections? | Rational Libertarian Corner

  • Pingback: The Myth of Corruption Making India Poor | Rational Libertarian Corner Blog

  • Pingback: Right to Reject for Indian Citizens | Rational Libertarian Corner

  • Pingback: How India is becoming a Totalitarian State A Brave New World | Rational Libertarian Corner

  • http://currency-converter-indian.blogspot.com/ currency converter

    Thanks a lot for sharing this with all of us you actually recognize what you’re talking about! Bookmarked. Please also consult with my website =). We may have a hyperlink trade agreement among us

  • anuraag

    hello sudha
    I am in a kind of love with ur blog n the way u try to present things in a much simpler way than they appear. that’s why I have gone thru’ various posts of ur blog n tried to reason with ur simple and straight philosophy f liberalism which seems applicable to things ranging infinitely. I happen to agree with quite a lot stuff here bt obviously dissension also manifests more often than not.

    //Assume a village of 50 people where the total amount of currency is Rs100 and the total production of wheat is 100 kilos for a day. Obviously in this village, everybody will be able to buy 1 kilogram of wheat every day. While some people will be able to save some money even after buying the required one kilogram of wheat every day, some other will fail to save any money as all will be spend in buying wheat and eating food.//

    i don’t get ur logic here. how come everybody is able to buy 1 kg of wheat everyday when currency is not uniformly distributed. I mean for that every person needs to have at least one rupee in his account everyday.

    // Let’s say those group of people saved and deposited Rs50 in Swiss Banks. So now, the total currency in that village is Rs50. However, the weight of available wheat is still 100 kilogram per day and total number of people is still 50. The next day, the shopkeepers will sell the wheat at the same price of Rs1 per kilogram, but they will find that many people were unable to buy the wheat because the total currency is only Rs50 while total wheat is 100 Kilogram.//

    Now if the assumption of uniform distribution is granted or somehow its ok that every body buys 1 kg of wheat everyday as per natural requirement. Then the consumption requirement of that village is 50 kg per day only and the rest 50 kg is again redundant. So the extra wheat is available to be exchanged with some other village for some different product or service. How does stealing this fifty units f currency change the consumption pattern of wheat??

    n the money that is deposited in other village does not disappear from world. It is still owned by the individual and can be accessed by making a direct cash withdrawal going to other village or using travelers checks n other ways. When u can make a transaction on ur private money then it hardly makes any difference. Only difference made is if it is national asset or individual claim..

    • http://rationallibertariancorner.com/ Unpretentious Diva

      Anurag, thanks for the appreciation…

      Regarding the issues you have raised,

      I mean for that every person needs to have at least one rupee in his account everyday.

      Well, this is an assumed fact that initially, the money is evenly distributed, which is the best possible scenario (however, it is not practical) but let’s assume it for a best possible explanation.

      Then the consumption requirement of that village is 50 kg per day only and the rest 50 kg is again redundant.

      I never said that did I? I said that somehow government increased the currency.
      But let’s talk about your assumption.
      Consumption requirement is still 100 Kilogram, 1 Kg for every person everyday. You are assuming that 50 people will start living without food, but that is not practical. They need wheat but they do not have money (which they invested in Swiss Banks). So they will go hungry. Do you see the irrationality in this assumption? It is not possible.

      There are only Rs50, and the total wheat is 100Kg, and initially, we have assumed that this village is a closed economy just like Indian national economy.

      Now the shopkeeper either can sell this remaining wheat to another village, which will cost him transfer cost and delivery cost and will reduce his profit while a big portion of wheat will also be destroyed because of the possible delays in delivery. The other way for the shopkeeper is to reduce the price of wheat so that he may be able to sell all his wheat and may save the cost of preserving and protecting the wheat against natural decay.

      This will come naturally and the shopkeeper will be forced by natural situations to reduce the cost of wheat to Rs0.5 per kilogram.

      When u can make a transaction on ur private money then it hardly makes any difference.

      True, but it is not about being able to make transactions, it is about the fact that money is not an asset, rather it is just a means to transfer the value of real assets. Since the power of increasing or decreasing currency is in the hands of government, the real beneficiaries of increasing of currency are those who get it first (the big banks and corporates). And the real people who suffer the results of increasing money are the poors. Increasing money is inflation and when it is increased, it causes price rise for those who get it at the last (that is common people). Its simple, the day when there were Rs100 and 100 KG of wheat, the price was Rs1 per kilo of wheat. The day when government increased currency, it became Rs150, with 100 Kg of wheat. The price is still Rs1 per kilo, the people who got this extra money first had more Power to Purchase. While the rest still had same power to purchase.

      • anuraag

        Unpretentious Diva
        it seems u have answered my queries in a hurry without even reading by rights.

        **Then the consumption requirement of that village is 50 kg per day only and the rest 50 kg is again redundant.**

        did u say that? yes u did.
        // a village of 50 people//
        // Obviously in this village, everybody will be able to buy 1 kilogram of wheat every day//
        //While some people will be able to save some money even after buying ****the required one kilogram of wheat every day****//

        now if there are 50 ppl and each requires 1 kg a day then total requirement of village is 50 multiplied by 1 equal to 50 kg.

        //Consumption requirement is still 100 Kilogram, 1 Kg for every person everyday. You are assuming that 50 people will start living without food, but that is not practical. They need wheat but they do not have money (which they invested in Swiss Banks). So they will go hungry. Do you see the irrationality in this assumption? It is not possible.//

        I don’t know wat were you thinking when u wrote this piece.. simply not done.

        //Now the shopkeeper either can sell this remaining wheat to another village, which will cost him transfer cost and delivery cost and will reduce his profit while a big portion of wheat will also be destroyed because of the possible delays in delivery. The other way for the shopkeeper is to reduce the price of wheat so that he may be able to sell all his wheat and may save the cost of preserving and protecting the wheat against natural decay.

        This will come naturally and the shopkeeper will be forced by natural situations to reduce the cost of wheat to Rs0.5 per kilogram.//

        this is just like the assertion-reasoning questions of competitive exams. reasoning is correct but is not the explanation of assertion :)

        //True, but it is not about being able to make transactions, it is about the fact that money is not an asset, rather it is just a means to transfer the value of real assets>>>> Since the power of increasing or decre…… /////

        This is just a fiat currency. Using it as a plastic money (thru’ various cards) or using it as cash doesn’t and shouldn’t affect consumption pattern or the price or the purchasing power.

        For this particular mathematical case formulated by you, govt doesn even need to increase or decrease the currency in the economy.

        • http://rationallibertariancorner.com/ Unpretentious Diva

          Well, I agree that I answered your question in a hurry. That’s why I missed the pont of contention.

          See, there are 50 people, and a total economy of Rs100 with 100 Kilogram of wheat. It is not the case where everyone has Rs2 (as I mentioned in my last comment). Rather, some people can buy more wheat than others because they have more money while some others can just buy 1 kilogram of wheat (I have mentioned everyone can buy 1 kilogram of wheat everyday.) But I didn’t say that every body needs only 1 kilogram of wheat. 100 kilogram of wheat is consumed by 50 people of the village every day. Some of them are over-eaters/fat obese, some are malnutritioned or whatever. But the sales for shopkeeper is of of 100 kilogram of wheat everyday and he sells it at Rs1 per kilo.

          This is just a fiat currency. Using it as a plastic money (thru’ various cards) or using it as cash doesn’t and shouldn’t affect consumption pattern or the price or the purchasing power.

          Fiat currency or Gold currency or Digital Currency or any other type of currency is certainly the purchasing power. If you increase it, its value decreases (purchasing power devaluation) and the price rises. if you decrease it, its value increases (purchasing power increment) and prices go down.

          In the mathematical case, only the number of people and the weight of wheat is constant, the desire of wheat by every individual is certainly not constant,it variates. I never said that everyone ‘needs’ only 1 kg of wheat everyday, but yes I said everyone can buy 1 kilogram of wheat everyday because there are Rs100 (in total) and 100 kilogram of wheat (in total) at a price of Rs1 per kilo. And I assumed everyone has at least one Rupee.

          And well, Government in any case (not only this particular case) DOES NOT NEED to increase or decrease currency because it creates havoc in every case.

  • http://n/a Rohit pandey

    every one work 4 black money . thanks

  • shashank sharma

    Sir You are really great …whoever you are but i beleive you should spread this message in public and join politics as well

    • http://rationallibertariancorner.com/ Unpretentious Diva

      well, I am not a sir, but a woman, a mother.

      And I have no interest in politics, but yes, I will try to spread it in masses and hope you will help me in doing so.

      Anyways, thanks for the appreciation.

  • ashutosh sharma

    BUT STILL YOU CANT GLORIFY THE CORRUPT LEADERS WHO ROBBED INDIA WITH SCAMS WAT ABT IF INDIAN MONEY WOULD BE DEPOSITED IN FORM OF GOLD?? THEN?

    • http://rationallibertariancorner.com/ Sudha Saraswat

      Ashutosh, I am not “glorifying” corrupt leaders, rather, I am offering
      you the reality that the WHOLE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT. And rather than asking
      for corrupt money brought back to India (Since it is corrupt, it will
      further cause poverty), the better idea, the better aim is to END THE
      SYSTEM OF CORRUPT MONEY, END FIAT CURRENCY.

      If the Indian money
      is in gold (Please read other comments, I have already discussed that issue), you may have a case to bring it back. But what good it will
      do? The system is corrupt, so even if you bring that money back, it will
      again go to the corrupt pits.

      You need to understand that India
      or Indians are not poor because there is less money, they are poor
      because there is less WEALTH. Learn the difference between “Wealth” and
      “Money.” Government can and do print money out of thin air. It can’t
      produce wealth. Individuals Can Produce Wealth and they do, But The
      Government, those very same corrupt leaders, restrict individuals from
      creating wealth by its governmental system, government and bureaucracy.

      You
      or I or any other one doesn’t need gold, we do need freedom to create
      our own hard earned wealth, and well, there is no “Freedom” in India.